教师话语标记语与课堂语境

在话语交际中,说话人为了实现交际目的,不仅要传递基本信息,还要用恰当的语言手段和语言成分来传达语用信息,构建语篇语境。话语标记语是说话人明示话语意图的手段,是听话人推导话语意义的标识。课堂语境具有很强的可构建性,教师话语标记语对课堂语境的构建起着重要的作用。     

论当代小说的叙述反讽

叙述反讽是一种基本的反讽性话语表达方式,旨在通过对立两项的悖逆冲突,更深刻地披显作品的真实意旨.当代小说的叙述反讽艺术主要体现在四个方面:戏谑反讽,通过戏拟性文本与母本间表层语码的相似及深层语码的逆忤制造反讽意义;语调反讽,通过叙述语调与叙述内容及表达意旨的乖离产生反讽效果;话语反讽,通过误用话语的语用规则生成反讽意味;视点反讽,通过异常叙述者的独特视角与惯常视角的相异形成反讽意蕴.     

语篇理解过程及其心理机制

从认知心理学、心理语言学角度讨论了语篇理解的过程及其心理机制。首先从命题、推断、局部与整体连贯三个层次上讨论了语篇理解的认知过程 ;然后从认知构件、认知理解模式对认知结构的模拟以及语篇处理过程中的资源限制三个维度论述了语篇理解的心理机制。文章最后指出 ,语篇理解研究的进一步深化取决于研究方法的改进和研究领域的拓展     

语篇的衔接与连贯问题

语篇源自语言交际,是高于句子的层面,表示一个整体意义;语篇的衔接与连贯,分属两个概念,应该区别对待。语篇对于连贯的依赖似乎更为明显:衔接方式得当但语义不贯通的话语不是合格的语篇,衔接方式不明显但语义贯通的话语是合格的语篇;立足于语篇的基础理论,有利于我们提高对衔接与连贯的理性思考,可有效地防止在语篇分析过程中出现较大的偏误。     

试论"话语"一词的含义

“话语”一词在人文社会学科中有诸多不同的含义和用法。我们不能给“话语”下一　个属加种差的定义，然而我们可以从语用学的角度梳理“话语”一词的各种用法，并在福柯　知识考古学与权力系谱学的基础上对这个词作出概念性的说明。     

小说话语的独特性

小说在文明之初曾经有着重要的文化功能 ,但在班固等学者给小说下定义的时代 ,它已成为边缘性的话语形态 ,地位低贱。然而恰恰因为它的独特地位 ,使其能够海纳百川 ,汲取史传、诗歌等话语系统的营养。小说话语的开放性品格 ,也使其容纳了最复杂的话语元素 ,最丰富的思想内容。     

后现代主义文学的网络话语

文章探讨了网络对文学活动的强大影响,进而闸述了后现代状态下网络文学话语的特点。     

论应用写作中的语篇思维模式

思维是写作过程运思阶段的核心 ,应用文的语言和结构是思维的外化形式 ,应用文体有特殊的语篇思维模式 ,本文认为大部分应用文体呈现出直线型语篇思维模式 ;并探讨了应用写作实践中常见的语篇思维模式的特点及相关思维能力的培养     

An Interview with Georg Lind

Georg Lind is being interviewed by Helen Haste about his work in moral psychology. In the interview, he discusses the meaning and measurement of moral competencies, which he sees as crucial to bridge the gap between moral ideals and action, and to maintain modern democracies, which rely on the enactment of shared moral ideals. Lind has carried out and inspired one of the largest research programs in moral psychology, including longitudinal, cross-cultural, intervention, and experimental studies. His new methodology, the Moral Judgment Test, has been translated and adapted into many languages. Lind has also contributed much to the improvement and dissemination of educational methods to foster moral competencies. The intellectual and biographical roots of his interests are explored.     

Hearts and Minds and Morality: Analyzing Moral Vocabularies in Qualitative Studies

A strategy of analyzing the moral vocabulary of a social movement or subculture is proposed by which ethnographies and other qualitative works may place the moral and ethical concepts used by respondents into a broader sociological context. Through examining the moral resources, the status hierarchy which the specific moral resources within a given moral vocabulary form, and the historical and cultural contexts within which these moral resources exist, it is argued that it becomes possible to analyze and anticipate the moral claims and form of discourse which will be produced by a specific movement and/or subculture. It is also argued that this method may be used to predict how the opposition to a movement and/or subculture is perceived through the formation of an antithetical moral vocabulary.